When Skepticism Becomes Cruelty: Megyn Kelly and the Cornell Jane Doe
There is a legitimate conversation to be had about the Cornell Seven case. There are disputed facts. There are questions about consent, intoxication, changing accounts, investigative decisions, due process and how institutions responded. Seven men have been publicly accused of serious conduct, and those allegations have not yet resulted in criminal convictions. Those questions deserve scrutiny. What they do not require is cruelty. And that is where Megyn Kelly crossed a line. In discussing Jane Doe, the woman who alleges she was drugged and sexually assaulted by members of Cornell University’s Chi Phi fraternity, Kelly did not limit herself to …
When Skepticism Becomes Cruelty: Megyn Kelly and the Cornell Jane Doe Read Post »
