Lindsay Clancy

Blog Post - Motion 25 Denied

The Motion the Internet Put on Trial: What Judge Sullivan Actually Decided

On September 29, 2026, Lindsay Clancy returned to Plymouth Superior Court for the first time since her murder trial ended in a mistrial. Her attorney, Kevin Reddington, renewed a request under Massachusetts Rule of Criminal Procedure 25 asking Judge William Sullivan to enter findings of not guilty rather than permit the case to return to another jury. Two days later, Judge Sullivan denied that request in a five-page written ruling. Online, the decision was quickly compressed into competing headlines: the judge had “rejected the insanity defence,” the judge had “confirmed her guilt,” the defence had suddenly claimed Clancy “didn’t do …

The Motion the Internet Put on Trial: What Judge Sullivan Actually Decided Read Post »

Blog Post - After the Mistrial Hearing

After the Mistrial: Lindsay Clancy Defense 180

The Lindsay Clancy Defence Changes the Question The first trial asked whether Lindsay Clancy was criminally responsible when she killed her three children. Now, her lawyers are asking whether the Commonwealth proved she killed them at all.After the Mistrial: The Lindsay Clancy Defence Changes the Question When Lindsay Clancy: Evidence and Public Opinion ended, the criminal case had ended in a mistrial. Eleven jurors reportedly favoured finding Clancy not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility. One juror disagreed. Because Massachusetts requires a unanimous verdict, Judge William Sullivan discharged the jury without a verdict on September 4, 2026. The …

After the Mistrial: Lindsay Clancy Defense 180 Read Post »

Shopping Cart
Scroll to Top